翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Boaron ・ Boars Hill ・ Boars in heraldry ・ Boars Tusk ・ Boarstall ・ Boarstall Duck Decoy ・ Boarstall Tower ・ Board of Trade ・ Board of Trade (disambiguation) ・ Board of Trade Building ・ Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. Olsen ・ Board of Trade of Metropolitan Montreal ・ Board of Trustees of Dartmouth College ・ Board of Trustees of State University of New York v. Fox ・ Board of Trustees of the Catholic University of America ・ Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett ・ Board of Trustees of the University of Oregon ・ Board of Veterans' Appeals ・ Board of War ・ Board on Infrastructure and Constructed Environment ・ Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy ・ Board portal ・ Board President's XI ・ Board puzzles with algebra of binary variables ・ Board representation (chess) ・ Board roof ・ Board shear ・ Board support package ・ Board toilet ・ Board track racing Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett ： ウィキペディア英語版 Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett ''Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett'', 531 U.S. 356 (2001), was a United States Supreme Court case about Congress's enforcement powers under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. It decided that Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act was unconstitutional insofar as it allowed states to be sued by private citizens for money damages. ==Facts== The plaintiffs were Milton Ash and Patricia Garrett, employees of the University of Alabama school system. Both were disabled under the definition of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Ash was a security guard who had a lifelong history of severe asthma, and Garrett was a nurse who had been diagnosed with breast cancer requiring time-consuming radiation and chemotherapy treatments. Both alleged that they had been discriminated against at their jobs; the University had refused to assign Ash to duties that would alleviate his asthma, and insisted on transferring Garrett due to her absences. Ash and Garrett filed a suit in federal court against the University of Alabama for damages, arguing that the University had violated Title I of the ADA, the part of the ADA prohibiting discrimination in employment on the basis of disability. The University of Alabama responded with a motion to dismiss on the grounds that the Eleventh Amendment prohibited the suit. The United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama dismissed both cases on this ground, but the Eleventh Circuit reversed, holding that Congress had expressly abrogated the sovereign immunity of the states. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.